Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:20

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia bombards Ukraine with 479 drones overnight, Ukrainian air force says - ABC News
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Scientists Stumble Upon The World’s Oldest Stomach Stone Fossil - The Daily Galaxy
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Top fantasy baseball prospects: Chase Burns getting the call, Colt Emerson heating up - NBC Sports
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Can adults grow new brain cells? - Live Science
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
The solar system's greatest mystery may finally be solved - Phys.org